New SPAC Boom Rhymes Uncannily With The Last One
The New SPAC Boom Mirrors the Last One: In-Depth Analysis and Company Insights
The New SPAC Boom Mirrors the Last One: In-Depth Analysis and Company Insights
Executive Summary
The resurgence of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) in 2024-2025 echoes the dynamics of the previous SPAC boom of 2020-2021. This report explores the similarities and differences between the two waves, focusing on market drivers, regulatory environment, and investor sentiment. We analyze a leading SPAC company from the current boom, Pershing Square Tontine Holdings (PSTH), which has been a prominent player in the SPAC space. The report includes a detailed financial and business model assessment, quality of earnings considerations, and growth trajectory evaluation.
Our findings indicate that while the new SPAC boom benefits from lessons learned in the prior cycle, challenges such as increased regulatory scrutiny, market volatility, and investor skepticism remain significant. The quality of earnings and sustainability of growth for SPAC targets are under closer examination, emphasizing the need for rigorous due diligence.
Background: The New SPAC Boom and Its Parallels
SPACs, also known as "blank check companies," surged in popularity during 2020-2021, raising over $160 billion globally. After a cooling-off period marked by regulatory clampdowns and market corrections, 2024 has seen a renewed interest in SPACs, driven by evolving market conditions and investor appetite for alternative investment vehicles.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the new SPAC boom is characterized by more experienced sponsors, larger deal sizes, and a focus on high-quality targets, contrasting with the more speculative nature of the last cycle.
However, the structural similarities remain: SPACs continue to offer a faster route to public markets for private companies, while investors seek outsized returns amid low interest rates and volatile equity markets.
Company Spotlight: Pershing Square Tontine Holdings (PSTH)
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, led by renowned investor Bill Ackman, is one of the most high-profile SPACs from the previous boom and remains active in the current market. PSTH raised $4 billion in its IPO in 2020, the largest SPAC IPO to date, and has been involved in several high-stakes merger negotiations.
As of mid-2025, PSTH has yet to complete a business combination, reflecting the challenges of finding suitable targets amid heightened due diligence and market volatility. The company’s financials and strategic positioning provide valuable insights into the evolving SPAC landscape.
Financial Overview of Pershing Square Tontine Holdings (PSTH)
Below is a summary of PSTH’s key financial metrics from 2021 through 2024, including cash reserves, liabilities, and market capitalization. Since PSTH is a SPAC without operating revenues, the focus is on cash and trust assets, expenses, and share price performance.
| Year | Cash & Trust Assets (USD Billion) | Operating Expenses (USD Million) | Market Capitalization (USD Billion) | SPAC Units Outstanding (Million) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4.0 | 15 | 4.5 | 400 |
| 2022 | 3.9 | 18 | 3.8 | 400 |
| 2023 | 3.7 | 20 | 3.2 | 400 |
| 2024 (Q1-Q2) | 3.5 | 10 | 3.0 | 400 |
Interactive Financial Data Visualization
The chart below visualizes PSTH’s cash & trust assets alongside market capitalization from 2021 to mid-2024, illustrating the gradual decline in cash reserves and market value as the SPAC approaches a business combination.
Quality of Earnings and Business Model Assessment
As a SPAC, PSTH’s earnings quality is atypical since it does not generate operating revenues or EBITDA. Instead, its value depends on the trust assets and the eventual merger target’s financials. Key considerations include:
- Non-recurring items: Operating expenses primarily consist of sponsor fees, legal, and administrative costs, which are non-recurring post-merger.
- Revenue recognition: No revenues until a business combination is completed.
- Cost structure: Fixed costs related to SPAC maintenance and sponsor compensation.
- Margin sustainability: Not applicable pre-merger; post-merger margins depend on the target company.
The sustainability of PSTH’s business model hinges on successfully identifying and merging with a high-quality target that can deliver sustainable earnings growth.
Growth Trajectory and Market Position
PSTH’s growth trajectory is linked to the broader SPAC market and its ability to consummate a merger. The company’s large capital base and sponsor reputation position it well, but the extended timeline without a deal has pressured its market capitalization.
Compared to industry peers, PSTH remains one of the largest SPACs by capital raised but lags in deal completion. The new SPAC boom features smaller, more targeted SPACs with quicker deal timelines, reflecting a shift in market dynamics.
Key Risks and Considerations
- Regulatory scrutiny: Increased SEC oversight on SPAC disclosures and accounting practices.
- Market volatility: Equity market fluctuations impact SPAC share prices and investor sentiment.
- Target quality risk: Difficulty in sourcing attractive merger candidates with sustainable earnings.
- Redemption risk: Shareholder redemptions can reduce available merger capital.
Conclusion
The new SPAC boom shares many characteristics with the previous cycle but is marked by greater maturity and caution among sponsors and investors. Pershing Square Tontine Holdings exemplifies the challenges and opportunities in this environment. While the company’s large capital base and sponsor pedigree are strengths, the absence of a completed merger after several years highlights the importance of rigorous due diligence and realistic growth expectations.
Investors and stakeholders should carefully evaluate the quality of earnings and sustainability of growth for SPAC targets, considering the evolving regulatory landscape and market conditions.
Sources: