```htmlQuality of Earnings Report: Chime Financial, Inc.

Quality of Earnings Report

Company: Chime Financial, Inc.

Date of Report: June 17, 2025

Prepared For: M&A, Investment, and Due Diligence Stakeholders

Executive Summary

This Quality of Earnings (QoE) report provides an assessment of Chime Financial, Inc. ("Chime"), a leading U.S. financial technology company offering mobile-first banking services. Chime has demonstrated significant user growth and achieved reported EBITDA profitability, positioning it as a prominent candidate for a potential Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2025.

The core revenue stream is interchange fees, highly dependent on transaction volume. While its business model is scalable, it faces intense competition, regulatory scrutiny, and reliance on partner banks. Key strengths include a large and growing user base, a strong brand targeting underserved demographics, and recent profitability milestones. Potential risks revolve around the sustainability of its low-fee model, customer acquisition costs, regulatory changes impacting interchange fees, and the path to consistent GAAP net income.

This report analyzes publicly available information. A comprehensive QoE assessment would require access to detailed, non-public financial statements and operational data. Further due diligence is crucial, particularly concerning revenue concentration, cost structure details, and regulatory compliance.

1. Company Overview

Chime Financial, Inc. operates as a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services are provided by The Bancorp Bank, N.A. or Stride Bank, N.A., Members FDIC. Chime offers checking and savings accounts, a debit card, and credit-building products with a focus on fee transparency and accessibility, primarily targeting low-to-moderate-income consumers. Its value proposition centers around no monthly fees, no overdraft fees (SpotMe® feature), and early direct deposit access.

2. Data Analysis & Earnings Quality

The financial data presented below is based on publicly available reports, estimates, and company statements. Access to audited financial statements is necessary for a definitive QoE analysis and calculation of normalized EBITDA.

2.1. Key Financial Metrics (Estimated/Reported)

2.2. Normalized EBITDA Considerations

A true normalized EBITDA calculation would require adjustments for items such as:

• Stock-Based Compensation: Common in tech companies, a non-cash expense.
• One-Time Marketing Campaigns: Significant user acquisition costs might include large, non-recurring campaigns.
• Litigation or Regulatory Settlements: If any, these would be non-recurring.
• M&A Related Costs: If Chime has made acquisitions.
• Product Development & Launch Costs: Capitalization policies for software development.

The reported achievement of EBITDA profitability is a positive indicator. However, the magnitude and sustainability of this profitability, and the bridge to GAAP net income, require detailed scrutiny of internal financials.

2.3. Revenue Recognition & Quality

Chime's primary revenue source is interchange fees generated when users transact with their Chime debit cards. This revenue is generally high quality, tied directly to user activity and transaction volume. Other potential revenue sources could include ATM fees (though minimized), referral fees, or interest income on deposits held with partner banks (less direct).

Key considerations for revenue quality:

• Dependency on Interchange Rates: These rates (e.g., Durbin Amendment impact) can be subject to regulatory changes, posing a potential risk.
• User Activity Levels: Revenue is directly correlated with the number of active, transacting users. Stagnation in user activity or high churn could impact revenue.
• Revenue Concentration: Over-reliance on interchange fees. Diversification efforts (e.g., new products like credit builder) are important.

2.4. Cost Structure & Margin Sustainability

Chime's key cost drivers likely include:

• Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC): Significant marketing and promotional spending to attract new users in a competitive market.
• Technology & Infrastructure: Costs for maintaining and developing its mobile platform.
• Customer Support: Servicing a large user base.
• Compliance & Fraud Prevention: Critical for financial services.
• Partner Bank Fees: Fees paid to The Bancorp Bank and Stride Bank for providing banking services.

The achievement of EBITDA profitability suggests Chime is managing its cost structure effectively against its revenue growth. However, margin sustainability will depend on controlling CAC, scaling operations efficiently, and managing fraud losses. The "fee-free" model puts pressure on maximizing interchange revenue per user and operational efficiency.

3. Business Model Assessment

3.1. Core Revenue Streams & Cost Drivers

Revenue Streams:

• Interchange fees from debit card transactions (primary).
• Out-of-network ATM fees (though Chime offers a large fee-free ATM network).
• Potential interest earned on non-interest bearing deposits held by partner banks (indirect benefit).
• Fees from other services (e.g., related to its Credit Builder product, though details are not public).

Cost Drivers:

• Marketing and advertising for user acquisition.
• Technology development and platform maintenance.
• Customer service operations.
• Fraud prevention and security.
• Regulatory compliance costs.
• Operational costs shared with or paid to partner banks.

3.2. Scalability & Sustainability

Scalability: High. The digital-native model allows for rapid scaling of user numbers without proportional increases in physical infrastructure. Technology investments are key to maintaining scalability.

Sustainability: Moderate to High, with caveats.

• Strong Brand & User Base: Chime has built a significant brand appealing to a demographic often underserved by traditional banks.
• Network Effects: A larger user base can attract more services and partners.
• Competitive Landscape: Intense competition from other neobanks (e.g., Varo, Current, SoFi) and incumbent banks improving their digital offerings.
• Profitability Path: While EBITDA positive, consistent GAAP net profitability and the timeline to achieve it are crucial for long-term sustainability, especially in public markets.
• Regulatory Risks: Changes in interchange fee regulations, "junk fee" scrutiny, or requirements for fintechs acting like banks could impact the model.
• Customer Loyalty & Churn: Maintaining user engagement and minimizing churn in a market with low switching costs is vital.

3.3. Key Operational Risks & Dependencies

• Reliance on Partner Banks: Chime is not a bank and relies on The Bancorp Bank and Stride Bank. Any disruption to these partnerships would be significant. This is a critical dependency.
• Cybersecurity & Data Privacy: As a financial platform, Chime is a target for cyberattacks. Breaches can lead to financial loss and reputational damage.
• Fraud Management: Neobanks can be targets for fraudulent activities. Effective fraud prevention systems are crucial to control losses.
• Regulatory Compliance: Navigating complex financial regulations (AML, KYC, consumer protection) is an ongoing operational burden and risk.
• Technology Platform Stability: Outages or performance issues can severely impact user trust and access to funds.

4. Growth Trajectory Evaluation

4.1. Historical Growth Rates & Drivers

Chime has experienced rapid historical growth, primarily driven by:

• Organic User Acquisition: Strong brand messaging, word-of-mouth, and effective digital marketing targeting its core demographic.
• Product Innovation: Features like early direct deposit, SpotMe (fee-free overdraft), and Credit Builder have been key attractors.
• Market Opportunity: Tapping into a large market of consumers dissatisfied with traditional banking fees and services.
• Venture Capital Funding: Significant funding rounds (totaling over $2.3 billion, with a $25B valuation in 2021) have fueled marketing spend and product development.

Growth has been predominantly organic rather than through major acquisitions.

4.2. Future Growth Potential

Chime's future growth potential remains significant, contingent on:

• Market Penetration: Continued acquisition of new users in the U.S. market.
• Product Expansion: Introducing new financial products (e.g., investments, loans, insurance) to increase revenue per user and engagement. This is a key opportunity.
• International Expansion: Potentially expanding to other markets, though this would introduce new regulatory and competitive challenges.
• Monetization Strategies: Optimizing existing revenue streams and developing new ones without compromising its core "customer-friendly" value proposition.
• IPO and Access to Capital: A successful IPO could provide further capital for growth initiatives and enhance brand credibility.

4.3. Benchmarking Against Industry Peers

Chime competes with other neobanks and digital banking platforms. Benchmarking should focus on:

• User Growth Rates & CAC: How Chime's acquisition efficiency compares.
• Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): A key metric for monetization effectiveness.
• Customer Engagement & Churn Rates: Indicative of platform stickiness.
• Path to Profitability: Comparing timelines and strategies for achieving sustained profitability (both EBITDA and Net Income).
• Product Offerings: Breadth and depth of financial services offered.

Compared to many peers, Chime's reported EBITDA profitability and large user base are competitive advantages. However, some competitors may have banking charters (e.g., Varo, SoFi), offering different structural advantages and disadvantages.

5. Key Findings, Risks, and Areas for Further Due Diligence

5.1. Summary of Strengths

• Large and Growing User Base: Significant market penetration and brand recognition.
• Reported EBITDA Profitability: Important milestone indicating improved operational efficiency and a step towards sustainable financial health.
• Strong Value Proposition: Fee-friendly model appeals to a specific, large demographic.
• Scalable Technology Platform: Allows for efficient growth.
• Potential for Product Diversification: Opportunities to increase ARPU.

5.2. Summary of Risks & Red Flags

• Reliance on Interchange Fees: Susceptible to regulatory changes and economic downturns affecting transaction volumes.
• Dependency on Partner Banks: Lack of own banking charter creates systemic risk.
• Intense Competition: Crowded market with both fintechs and incumbents.
• Regulatory Scrutiny: Increasing oversight of fintechs, particularly those with bank-like services.
• Sustainability of "Fee-Free" Model: Long-term pressure on margins if CAC remains high or new revenue streams are slow to develop.
• Path to GAAP Net Profitability: EBITDA profitability is positive, but sustained net income is the ultimate goal, especially for public market investors.
• Customer Churn: Potential for higher churn if value proposition is not consistently met or competitors offer better terms.

5.3. Areas Requiring Further Due Diligence

Should this analysis proceed towards a potential investment or M&A activity, thorough due diligence is imperative, focusing on:

• Detailed Financial Statements: Audited financials for at least three years to verify revenue, costs, calculate normalized EBITDA, and assess true earnings quality.
• Cohort Analysis: User acquisition cost, lifetime value (LTV), activity rates, and churn by user cohort.
• Breakdown of Revenue Sources: Detailed analysis of interchange fee components, contribution from other services.
• Cost Structure Deep Dive: Granular breakdown of CAC, technology costs, fraud losses, and partner bank fees.
• Regulatory Compliance Audit: Review of compliance programs, licenses, and any pending regulatory inquiries.
• Contracts with Partner Banks: Terms, fees, and stability of these critical partnerships.
• Technology Infrastructure Review: Scalability, security, and disaster recovery capabilities.
• Management Team and Internal Controls: Assessment of the leadership team and the robustness of internal financial controls.
• Customer Concentration (if any) and Geographical Concentration of users.

6. Illustrative Charts and Tables

The chart below uses publicly reported/estimated figures for illustrative purposes.

Chart: Chime Estimated User Growth and Revenue (2021-2023)

Citations & Sources (Based on Publicly Available Information)

This report synthesizes information from general news outlets and financial reporting. Direct financial data from Chime would be required for a definitive QoE. The following are representative of sources for public data points.

• <sup>[1]</sup> Forbes (April 2023). "Fintech’s Most Valuable Player Chime Is Growing And Profitable As It Readies An IPO". (Illustrative - actual user numbers require company disclosure; figures often cited in news.)
• <sup>[2]</sup> Reuters (February 2024). "Exclusive: Fintech Chime readies 2025 IPO with new CFO, investment bank hiring".
• <sup>[3]</sup> Business Insider / Bloomberg (February 2024). Articles discussing Chime's EBITDA profitability and IPO preparations.
• <sup>[4]</sup> CNBC (August 2021 / May 2023). Reports on Chime's Series G funding round and valuation.
• General industry analysis and reports on neobanks and the fintech sector.

Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes only and is based on publicly available information and estimates as of June 17, 2025. It does not constitute financial advice or an exhaustive due diligence analysis. Access to Chime's internal financial records is necessary for a complete Quality of Earnings assessment.

```